![](\"http:\/\/www.atanjumusul.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/sartre2.jpg\")
(…)<\/p>\n(…)<\/p>\n
“Kendi-i\u00e7in” varolmak, “kendi-i\u00e7inde”yi hi\u00e7le\u015ftirmektir. Bu ko\u015fullarda, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck bu hi\u00e7le\u015ftirmeden ba\u015fka bir \u015fey olamaz. Onun arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla “kendi-i\u00e7in” \u00f6z\u00fcnden oldu\u011fu gibi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan da kurtulur, onun arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla her zaman kendisinden s\u00f6z edebilecek \u015feyden farkl\u0131d\u0131r, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc en az\u0131ndan bu adland\u0131rmadan kurtulan ki\u015fidir ve ona verilen addan, ona tan\u0131nan sahiplikten \u00f6tede olan ki\u015fidir.<\/p>\n
“Kendi-i\u00e7in”in oldu\u011fu \u015fey olmak oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemek, oldu\u011fu \u015fey olmayarak oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemek, onda varolu\u015fun \u00f6z\u00fc, \u00f6z\u00fcn varolu\u015fu \u00f6nceledi\u011fini ve ko\u015fulland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemek ve Hegel’in form\u00fcl\u00fcne g\u00f6re “\u00f6z daha \u00f6nce olmu\u015f oland\u0131r” demek, tek ve ayn\u0131 \u015feyi s\u00f6ylemektir.Asl\u0131nda, eylemimi canland\u0131ran g\u00fcd\u00fclerin bilincinde oldu\u011fum olgusuyla, bu g\u00fcd\u00fcler \u00e7oktan bilincim i\u00e7in a\u015fk\u0131nsal nesnelerdir, d\u0131\u015far\u0131dad\u0131rlar; faydas\u0131zca onlara yap\u0131\u015fmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015facak m\u0131y\u0131m; varolu\u015fumla ondan kurtuluyorum. Her zaman \u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcn \u00f6tesinde, eylemimin nedenlerinin ve d\u00fcrt\u00fclerinin \u00f6tesinde varolmaya mahkumum; \u00f6zg\u00fcr olmaya mahkumum. Bu, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcme kendisinden ba\u015fka s\u0131n\u0131rlar bulunamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya \u00f6zg\u00fcr olmaktan vazge\u00e7mekte \u00f6zg\u00fcr olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z anlam\u0131na gelir.<\/p>\n
(…)<\/p>\n
\u0130nsan \u00f6zg\u00fcrd\u00fcr \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc kendi de\u011fildir, kendine kar\u015f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131r. Oldu\u011fu \u015fey olan varl\u0131k \u00f6zg\u00fcr olamaz. \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck tam da, insan\u0131n kalbinde olmu\u015f olan ve insan\u0131n ger\u00e7e\u011fini olmak yerine olu\u015fmaya zorlayan hi\u00e7liktir. \u0130nsan ger\u00e7e\u011fi i\u00e7in varolmak se\u00e7mektir: hi\u00e7bir \u015fey, alabilece\u011fi veya kabul edebilece\u011fi, ne i\u00e7eriden, ne de d\u0131\u015far\u0131dan ona gelmemektedir. \u0130nsan ger\u00e7e\u011fi, hi\u00e7bir t\u00fcrde hi\u00e7bir yard\u0131m olmadan, en k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ayr\u0131nt\u0131ya kadar kendini olu\u015fturman\u0131n dayan\u0131lmaz zorunlulu\u011funa tamamen terkedilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6ylece, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck bir varl\u0131k de\u011fildir; insan\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r yani onun varolma hi\u00e7li\u011fidir.<\/p>\n
(…)<\/p>\n
\u0130nsan bazen \u00f6zg\u00fcr, bazen k\u00f6le olamaz; insan, her zaman ya tam \u00f6zg\u00fcrd\u00fcr, ya da de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
(…)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
(…) “Kendi-i\u00e7in” varolmak, “kendi-i\u00e7inde”yi hi\u00e7le\u015ftirmektir. Bu ko\u015fullarda, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck bu hi\u00e7le\u015ftirmeden ba\u015fka bir \u015fey olamaz. Onun arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla “kendi-i\u00e7in” \u00f6z\u00fcnden oldu\u011fu gibi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan da kurtulur, onun arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla her zaman kendisinden s\u00f6z edebilecek \u015feyden farkl\u0131d\u0131r, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc en az\u0131ndan bu adland\u0131rmadan kurtulan ki\u015fidir ve ona verilen addan, ona tan\u0131nan sahiplikten \u00f6tede olan ki\u015fidir. “Kendi-i\u00e7in”in oldu\u011fu \u015fey olmak oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemek, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[103],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-4135","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-felsefe-genel"},"yoast_head":"\n