Trajik olan, bat\u0131l\u0131 insan\u0131n bilincinde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan bir yar\u0131lmayla kendini g\u00f6sterir. \u0130nsan\u0131 \u00f6zellikle kendi kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 bir \u00e7eli\u015fki i\u00e7inde b\u0131rakan, yabanc\u0131la\u015ft\u0131ran ve d\u00fcnya \u00fczerindeki yerini tan\u0131mlanamaz k\u0131lan bir durumdur bu. Tragedyan\u0131n neden bat\u0131ya \u00f6zg\u00fc bir t\u00fcr oldu\u011funu \u00f6rne\u011fin \u00c7in\u2019de ni\u00e7in ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bu minvalde de\u011ferlendirmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Evrenle uyumunu yitiren ve kendi ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klama \u00e7abalar\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fi y\u00fcz\u00fcnden \u00e7eli\u015fkiye d\u00fc\u015fen bat\u0131 insan\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda bir kabulleni\u015f i\u00e7inde, uyumlu bir hayat ya\u015fayan \u00c7inli aras\u0131ndaki bu temel farkl\u0131l\u0131k tragedyan\u0131n varl\u0131k sebebidir. <\/p>\n
Bat\u0131n\u0131n tragedyay\u0131 do\u011furan \u00f6zg\u00fcll\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn nedenleri bir \u00e7ok nosyondan\u00a0 kaynaklan\u0131r. Bunlar\u0131 temel de \u015fu \u015fekilde ifade edebiliriz:<\/p>\n
\u201cUzla\u015fmaz kar\u015f\u0131tl\u0131klar ile \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalar- anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r ile duyulur ikili\u011fi, Varl\u0131k ile Olu\u015f, Hakikat ile felsefedeki Kan\u0131 ikili\u011fi- \u00e7eli\u015fmezlik mant\u0131\u011f\u0131- insan\u0131n se\u00e7me ile \u00f6zg\u00fcr karar g\u00fcc\u00fc \u00fcst\u00fcne kurulu etik- iki kar\u015f\u0131t davan\u0131n, iki d\u00fc\u015fman s\u00f6ylemin \u00e7arp\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren hukuk ile siyaset uygulamas\u0131\u201d( Vernant, Eski Yunan\u2019da S\u00f6ylen ve Toplum,s.92-93) <\/em><\/p>\n Traji\u011fin do\u011fmas\u0131nda ve k\u00f6kle\u015fmesinde bu \u00e7eli\u015fmeci, uzla\u015f\u0131mdan uzak nosyonlar belirleyici olurlar.\u00a0 Bat\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n hem kendiyle hemde i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu do\u011fayla aras\u0131nda var olan uyumsuzluk traji\u011fi besler. Oysa do\u011funun tini insan\u0131 uzla\u015f\u0131ma, uyuma davet eder. Do\u011fu t\u00fcm ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 dinsel, inan\u00e7sal varl\u0131k ile doldurur. \u0130nsan, bu \u00e7eli\u015fki bar\u0131nd\u0131rmayan, tanr\u0131sal bilgi ile a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in bilinmezlik bar\u0131nd\u0131rmayan d\u00fcnyada traji\u011fi ya\u015fayacak kadar bile bo\u015fluk bulamaz. Bat\u0131 ya\u015fam\u0131nda ise trajik bir \u00f6z bulunur. Onlar\u0131n ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fc:<\/p>\n \u201cbelirsiz, bilinmez, kestirilmez olan kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda duyulan gerilim ile o b\u00fcy\u00fck ak\u0131\u015fa at\u0131lmak, o b\u00fcy\u00fck ak\u0131\u015f, kucaklamak, kula\u00e7lamak ve bilinmezi bilinir, karanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ayd\u0131nl\u0131k k\u0131lmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmakt\u0131r.\u201d (Erdemli, Atilla, \u201c\u0130nsan ya da Trajik olan\u201d, Navisalvia, ,s.30)<\/em> Tragedyan\u0131n bat\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n bir yarat\u0131m\u0131 olmas\u0131n\u0131n sonucunda bu konuyla ilgilenme iste\u011finde olan da yine bat\u0131l\u0131 olmu\u015ftur. Bu noktada Schelling, Schlegel ve\u00a0 Hegel \u00f6zellikle isimleri an\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcrlerdir.Bu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcrler ayd\u0131nlanman\u0131n da etkisiyle bireysel olan\u0131 yani kendilerini ke\u015ffetmelerine kar\u015f\u0131n bir zorunluluk d\u00fcnyas\u0131 i\u00e7inde de ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 biliyorlard\u0131. \u00d6rne\u011fin Schelling belirlenim kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131ndaki \u00f6zne olmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olamayan insan tekini \u00f6zg\u00fcrle\u015ftirmenin yollar\u0131n\u0131 arar\u00a0 felsefesinde. Ayn\u0131 \u015feyi di\u011fer filozoflarda da g\u00f6r\u00fcr\u00fcz. <\/p>\n Romantik ak\u0131ma dahil edebilece\u011fimiz yukarda ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcr ve sanat\u00e7\u0131lar, ku\u015fat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir d\u00fcnyada insan tekinin sesini a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131karmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131lar. Bireyin \u00e7evresini saran, onu g\u00f6r\u00fcnmez ve etkisiz k\u0131lan ko\u015fullar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131ndaki varolu\u015funu savundular. Burjuvazinin feodal cemaat\u00e7ili\u011finin yerine, ulusala ba\u011fl\u0131 bireyi y\u00fccelti\u015finin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn alan\u0131ndaki kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 oldular. \u00d6zellikle Alman romantik d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcrlerinin bu do\u011frultuda eserler verdiklerini g\u00f6r\u00fcr\u00fcz. Schelling\u2019in, Goethe\u2019nin, Schlegel Karde\u015flerin, Hegel\u2019in, H\u00f6lderlin\u2019in tragedyaya olan ilgisini de bu noktadan de\u011ferlendirmek gereklidir…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Trajik olan, bat\u0131l\u0131 insan\u0131n bilincinde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan bir yar\u0131lmayla kendini g\u00f6sterir. \u0130nsan\u0131 \u00f6zellikle kendi kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 bir \u00e7eli\u015fki i\u00e7inde b\u0131rakan, yabanc\u0131la\u015ft\u0131ran ve d\u00fcnya \u00fczerindeki yerini tan\u0131mlanamaz k\u0131lan bir durumdur bu. Tragedyan\u0131n neden bat\u0131ya \u00f6zg\u00fc bir t\u00fcr oldu\u011funu \u00f6rne\u011fin \u00c7in\u2019de ni\u00e7in ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bu minvalde de\u011ferlendirmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Evrenle uyumunu yitiren ve kendi ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klama \u00e7abalar\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fi […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[140],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-4748","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-erkan-kucuk-makale"},"yoast_head":"\n
\u0130nsan\u0131n bilinmez kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131ndaki \u00e7abas\u0131 tragedya sanat\u0131n\u0131n da kayna\u011f\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturdu. <\/p>\n